Because Court documents are normally sealed in this kind of case involving "molestation"... the following is offered only through this particular web page as they are FACT and except for a document in 2004, all others are a part of the Court Records...

This case was about "Molestation" issues, not "Rape"... For if the Charges and Conviction had been "Rape" there would be no "Molestation" term or word used! Rape is not "Molestation" for "Rape" would have caused for a 25 years to life sentence under the law and any "Sex Offender" Registry information would, in fact, state "Rape" not "Molestation"... But this case was about "Molestation" issues...

Page One of Two Pages

Click Here for the Next Document