|
|
|
Return to Home
Page

Regeneration or Degeneration: Orthodoxy and the
Crisis of Neo-Paganism
The
2004 Episcopal Council of the Russian Orthodox Church from 3rd to 8th
October has come to an end. It is clear that the Russian Orthodox Church,
both inside and outside Russia, is returning to the canonical norms of the
Orthodox Church. In report after report, in terms with which no Orthodox
can disagree, the Council made clear that progress is being made towards
the restoration of Church Life, but that there is still much to do. The
bitter heritage of three generations of Soviet oppression is still felt in
Russian society. Notably, Patriarch Alexis and Metropolitan Kyrill have
spoken, in terms reminiscent of those used by the Russian Orthodox Church
Outside Russia since the 1960s, of the links between terrorism, immorality
and the demographic crisis in Russia. The link is Neo-Paganism - the
bitter fruit of three generations of atheism.
Terrorism is indeed the fruit of paganism, the concept that
innocent human beings, including women and children, can be taken hostage,
maimed and massacred. By definition terrorism lives in a moral void. And
immorality is also the fruit of paganism, the concept that human life
exists only for selfish, sensual, depravity, with the result that the
victims of immorality see their lives destroyed by drugs and AIDS and that
tens of millions of children are aborted or abandoned. By definition,
immorality lives in a moral void. The result is both physical and
spiritual sterility. According to the October 1st edition of the British
journal The Economist, the population of Russia is now in steep
decline. On paper, the Russians as a race could almost disappear within a
hundred years, if there is no change, if, quite literally, there is no
rebirth, no regeneration.
The
problem is a spiritual one. The fact is that Russia has only ever known
two systems. One is Orthodoxy, the other is paganism. Whenever Russia
rejects Orthodoxy, it falls back into paganism, be it primitive,
pre-Orthodox materialistic animism, or post-Orthodox materialistic
Communism, or Western consumerism. However, the problem is also worldwide,
for the whole globalized world is going through a process of the rebirth
of paganism. Both terrorism and immorality are worldwide phenomena,
evidence of the rebirth of paganism, of Neo-Paganism.
By
Neo-Paganism we do not mean primitive pagan religions, such as one can
find in parts of Asia, Africa and elsewhere, with their fetishism and
animism. Here there is ignorance of Christ. But here there are also
moralities, albeit primitive, manmade ones. By Neo-Paganism neither do we
do mean various manmade philosophies such as Buddhism. Here there is
ignorance of Christ. But here there are also moralities, albeit
sophisticated, manmade ones.
By
Neo-Paganism we do not mean falling back into the Jewish Old Testament
moral law of vengeance, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth. This is
the foundation of two Old Testament religions, Judaism and Islam, which
both rejected the New Testament Revelation of Christ, the Unique
Revelation of Love and Forgiveness. Their Old Testament moral law is not
pagan, it is still a morality, although it does explain why the problems
of the Middle East are intractable. Until both sides forgive one another,
they are doomed to an everlasting vicious circle of bloody struggle, as
has been witnessed for well over fifty years, as is witnessed daily in
Gaza and elsewhere.
By
Neo-Paganism we mean the rejection of all moral values, the apostasy from
Christ by people once converted to Him and their rejection even of pagan
religions, manmade philosophies and Old Testament moral law. How else, for
example, can the brutal beheading of hostages in Iraq be explained? The
human sacrifices there are pure evil. Neo-Paganism is worse even than the
original paganism, which was a paganism of ignorance. Christ has come into
the world. Those who have not heard of him have an excuse. Apostates have
no excuse.
Christians cannot pride themselves either that they have accepted
Christ's Teaching. The whole history of Christianity has been a constant
falling back into the Old Testament. It can be seen especially in
Protestantism, which even systematically refuses the Christian Old
Testament in favour of the Jewish one. But Catholicism and even historic
Orthodoxy have at times fallen back into Old Testament ways. Christians
can indeed accuse themselves that Neo-Paganism has come into the world,
because we were unable to show Christ by example to the Non-Christian
world.
These tendencies can be seen in the Orthodox world. Two great
trends can be seen eating into our Orthodox world. The first is the lapse
into the Old Testament, the other the lapse into secularism.
On
the one hand, there are those who would make our Orthodox Christianity
into a mere shell of a religion, just another nationalist ghetto. They
would, for example, try to canonize Ivan the Terrible or Rasputin, simply
because they are of a certain nationality and are well-known to history.
This is the religion of the Jews, who rejected the New Testament in favour
of a national cult, refusing Christ, because He did not justify them and
instead preached to the whole world. And His Church followed Him,
preaching in the languages of the world. Beware, their Jewish values are
the values of apostasy, they are the values which give birth to
Neo-Paganism, where anything goes.
On
the other hand, there are those who would make our Orthodox Christianity
into a mere shell of a religion, just another form of secularist humanism.
They would swim with the tide, merge with secular Western values, simply
because that is the easy way out. This is the religion of the Greeks, who
rejected the New Testament in favour of an easy way of life, refusing
Christ, because He did not justify their world and instead preached the
other world. And His Church followed Him, preaching in the language of
Christ, not that of Neo-Puritan political correctness. Beware, their
secular values are the values of apostasy, they are the values which give
birth to Neo-Paganism, where anything goes.
Between the racist Jews and the humanist Greeks stands the Cross.
The Cross of Christ stands between extremes. The Cross thus becomes the
place of creativity, because creativity is born out of the creative
tension its place between extremes. As the Apostle preached: But we
preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumbling-block, and unto the
Greeks foolishness (1 Cor 1,23). A stumbling-block and foolishness,
because the place of the Cross is not only the place of the Crucifixion,
but also the place of New Life, of the Resurrection. And the Resurrection
is what, with its kiss of death, life-hating Neo-Paganism rejects as a
stumbling-block and foolishness.
The
choice is clear:
The
Risen Christ and Personal, Social, National and International
Regeneration.
Or:
Neo-Paganism and Personal, Social, National and International
Degeneration.
Let
the world decide.
Fr
Andrew
25
September/ 8 October 2004 St Sergius of Radonezh
|
|
|
|